Sentient Christian

#KJV / #AV_1611 Bible Believer. Exposing the false teachings of those purporting to be Christian, and exposing The Whore of Babylon in it's many forms. contact@sentientchristian.com

@pope@pontifex@catholic#catholic#pope#abuse:: Mystery of Iniquity Makes Strategic Change :: The Whore of Babylon is always trying to change its spots.


http://www.cwm.org.au/latest-cetf/337-7

@pope@pontifex@catholic #catholic # pope #abuse

Mystery of Iniquity Makes Strategic Change@pope@pontifex@catholic #catholic # pope #abuse

pfe8Vatican Council II (1962-1965) formally declared the Papacy’sstrategic change of tactics regarding the reunification of ProtestantsProtestants under Roman Catholicism, along with incorporating other faiths under its rule.@pope@pontifex@catholic #catholic # pope #abuse

Therefore, the Council moved from a position of “separation from other religions” to one of an all-encompassing ecumenism, not only with the religions of the world, but also with Bible believers in particular.

“Separated brethren” was the new term for these Bible believers who previously were called heretics.

Islam, Buddhism, and Hinduism previously called pagan religions were now accepted as religions that contain, “what is true and holy.”

This new approach was established by the Roman Catholic Church to win the world for herself, primarily by means of dialogue. The Council formulated its rules and goals of dialogue, which are carefully spelled out in her post-Conciliar Document No. 42, on ecumenism. It states that, “dialogue is not an end in itself … It is not just an academic discussion.”

Rather, “ecumenical dialogue… serves to transform modes of thought and behavior and the daily life of those [non-Roman Catholic] communities. In this way, it aims at preparing the way for their unity of faith in the bosom of a Church one and visible.”

Unlike the Body of Christ, whose unity is in Jesus Christ, the unity for which the Roman Church strives is an outward, visible unity, and one that will be enforceable through civil law – as her “Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church” spells out by means of many deceptive words.

The Pope’s official position is that “ecumenical encounter is not merely an individual work, but also a task of the Roman Church, which takes precedence over all individual opinions.”

The Papacy expects this process of dialogue to take time. The Roman Catholic Church’s aim of bringing “all Christian churches” under her authority is her clearly stated goal.

She says, “little by little, as the obstacles to perfect ecclesial communion are overcome, all Christians will be gathered, in a common celebration of the Eucharist [the Mass] into that unity of the one and only Church… This unity, we believe, dwells in the Catholic Church as something we can never lose.”

Pope John Paul II, while initially having been thought to be liberal and modern, further consolidated the dictatorial powers afforded him by the 1917 Code of Canon Law and by his purported infallibility, bequeathed him by Vatican Council I. This he did by revising the 1917 Code, making it even more conservative than it had been, and he was careful to appoint new bishops in line with his centralized way of thinking.

Like another Hildebrand, John Paul II was determined to build, by both Church and civil law, the structure by which the Papacy can again wield might and authority among the nations at the appropriate time.

This same Pope John Paul II was adamant in his efforts to update the laws of the Roman Catholic Church. Since the days of Hildebrand, popes have seen the necessity of making iron-like, inflexible church laws before attempting to control their subjects, and those not Roman Catholic, by compulsion if necessary.

In 1983, John Paul II’s revision of the 1917 Code of Canon Law added to the Roman Catholic laws. For example, “The Church has an innate and proper right to coerce offending members of the Christian faithful by means of penal sanctions.”

Examination of these laws shows them to be even more absolute and totalitarian than those of the past. If one rejects submission of his intellect and will to the Pope, or rejects some doctrines of the Papacy, by church law he can be severely punished. For example, Canon 1312 Para 2 states,

The law can establish other expiatory penalties which deprive a believer of some spiritual or temporal good and are consistent with the supernatural end of the Church.

5 comments on “@pope@pontifex@catholic#catholic#pope#abuse:: Mystery of Iniquity Makes Strategic Change :: The Whore of Babylon is always trying to change its spots.

  1. Pingback: What the Vatican / Papacy are really like… | Christian Spook

  2. Pingback: Catholicism, Past and Present – David Cloud | Christian Spook

  3. Pingback: @pope@pontifex@catholic #catholic # pope #abuse :: Karen Hudes – World Bank in Collusion with the Jesuits. | Christian Spook

  4. Pingback: The Whore Of Babylon | Christian Spook

  5. Pingback: Ecumenism is a Sin !! It is a Demonic Deception !! | Christian Spook

KJV / AV 1611- Proverbs 10:19 " In the multitude of words there wanteth not sin: but he that refraineth his lips is wise. " KJV / AV 1611

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

RSS Alan Watt

  • Sept. 25, 2016 "Cutting Through the Matrix" with Alan Watt (Blurb, i.e. Educational Talk): "Real News is Sparse, Usual Threatening Kind, Sign Every Agreement or Be Left Behind" *Title and Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Sept. 25, 2016 (Exempting Music and Literary Quotes) September 25, 2016

RSS Vimeo:SentientChristian

  • Why are #Catholics not complaining about their #Catholic so called #Priests ? June 26, 2016
    Why are #catholic's not complaining about #Pedophile so called #Priests ? Killing Time by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) Source: incompetech.com/music/royalty-free/index.html?isrc=USUAN1100570 Artist: incompetech.com/ Navajo Night by Audionautix is licensed under a Creative C […]
%d bloggers like this: